Rivals on Disney+, reviewed | Apollo Magazine

[ad_1]

Right from the opening titles, Disney’s Rivals leaves us in little doubt of when it is set – the steel balls of a Newton’s cradle, that ne plus ultra of executive toys; what looks to be a red Olivetti typewriter; the crimson stiletto (so unsuitable for the croquet lawn) from the original Jilly Cooper dustjacket. Yes, we’re in the 1980s, and quite aggressively so. Rivals is, effectively, a period drama, but rather than corsets or Empire-line dresses we are subjected to acres of taffeta, velvet and lamé, while every second male cast member sports a luxuriant Nigel Mansell moustache. There are leg-o’-mutton sleeves and peplums, aviator-style spectacle frames and red braces, the inevitable cordless phones in walkie-talkie proportions, Concorde, rollerboots; even a brace of Sinclair C5s are wheeled out. And all of this to an on-the-nose soundtrack of Tears for Fears, Bonnie Tyler and Adam & The Ants that comments on the action with all the subtlety of a Murray Walker voiceover.

The literary adaptation for which all these design notes are pressed into service is not a genteel comedy of manners but a lurid bonkbuster, where the ripped bodices are purchased from Littlewoods and office workers rut alongside a calendar saying ‘1986’. At one point Katherine Parkinson, as the tightly permed author surrogate Lizzie Vereker, admonishes the rakish Rupert Campbell-Black (Alex Hassell), a champion showjumper turned Thatcherite cabinet minister, in a manner that explicitly refers to Jane Austen’s Emma. But the social faux pas behind ‘Badly done, Rupert’ is the unsolicited insertion of his permatanned fingers up the skirt of a waitress during a dinner party. What would Uncle Walt say?

David Tennant, Nafessa Williams and Aidan Turner in the headquarters of fictional TV company Corinium. Photo: Robert Viglasky; © 2023 Disney. All Rights Reserved

It being the 1980s (as we are incessantly reminded), Margaret Thatcher is a constant, ghostly presence – impersonated by Parkinson, inaudible at the other end of a phone line, portrayed in long shot by a body double. Her legacy is also where Rivals approaches social commentary, hinging as it does on the conflict between old money, new money and even newer money. (The important thing is that everybody has piles of the stuff.) The characters are defined by their class, yet none of them seem to exhibit any. Peers of the realm and nouveau-riche entrepreneurs alike are gilded grotesques who dance along to the Birdie Song. Only Nafessa Williams emerges with anything approaching sartorial dignity, playing an American TV executive whose power-dressing wardrobe of Armani and Hermès could have been ripped from the pages of the yellowing fashion magazines that various extras are shown reading.

The set designs emphasise the class distinctions, running from ancestral piles in which the velvet ropes might have just been removed from view to Farrow & Ball minimalism or a rustic grange arrayed with studied bohemian clutter (Peter Blake print included). Meanwhile, the company HQ of Lord Baddingham (David Tennant) parallels and parodies these great estates; its interiors are beige, all Trimphones and venetian blinds, but the exterior boasts an extravagant portico and pilasters in the signature Legoland neoclassicism of postmodern architecture. The dominant style of the second half of the decade, its plastic-effect marble and scattergun pastiches were invariably deployed with a knowing ironic flourish, often in wildly inappropriate contexts. (It was around this time, for example, that a branch of Homebase in west London was built with a grandiose entrance in the style of pharaonic Egypt.) Both irony and inappropriateness are very much Rivals’ stock in trade, but the postmodern style also highlights a Thatcherite sense of the vulgar and the new being dressed up with the accoutrements of continuity and tradition. Appropriately, the chintzy TV-am-style set for the fictional series How to Stay Married has a kind of shop-bought Cotswolds cosiness that embodies the hypocritical contrast between professed ‘family values’ and the constant stream of infidelity on and off screen.

Bella Maclean as Taggie OHara surrounded by the studied bohemian clutter (Peter Blake print included) of the OHara family home. Photo: Sanne Gault; © 2023 Disney. All Rights Reserved

With its penchant for constipated smouldering, its joint love of kitsch and pornographic excess, Rivals resembles nothing so much as an eight-hour commercial for Nescafé Gold Blend directed by Jeff Koons. The tawdry glamour and slick ad-man’s sheen evoke the winking melodrama of a telenovela, but in the most parochial manner, more Howards’ Way in spirit than Dallas. The bathos is presumably intentional; this is, after all, a drama that hinges on competing bids for the renewal of an ITV regional franchise. There is, perhaps, a sense of nostalgia for the days when television programmes could pull in 20 million viewers at a time, and Aidan Turner as Declan O’Hara (an idealistic Wogan with a Borat ’tache) is given a stirring speech in which he speaks of television as ‘the greatest art form man has created’. Yet the script subverts itself here, since the kind of highbrow series O’Hara is seeking to commission would explicitly exclude Rivals, a knowingly shallow parade of full-frontals and campery that offers very little other than surface. And what could be more 1980s than that?

Danny Dyer and Lisa McGrillis as Freddie and Valerie Jones. Photo: Robert Viglasky; © 2023 Disney. All rights reserved

Rivals is available to view on Disney+ now.



[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

ART TREKS: Legion of Honor—Mary Cassatt at Work

[ad_1]

The “Modern Madonna”

During the last 15 years of her life, Cassatt became increasingly focused on creating artwork about women and children. This mother-and-child imagery helped Cassatt start a conversation around Old Master precedents—specifically, the religious images of the Madonna and Christ Child depicted by Italian Renaissance masters.

But Cassatt’s ability to create endlessly varied compositions from this theme also connects her late work to fellow Impressionists Claude Monet and Paul Cézanne, who treated the same subjects (water lilies and apples, respectively) again and again.

Event details:

Where: Legion of Honor (100 34th Ave., San Francisco, CA 94121)

When: Oct. 5, 2024-Jan. 26, 2025

Hours: 9:30 am-5:15 pm, Tuesday through Sunday; Closed on Mondays

Tickets: $20 for adults, $17 for seniors (65+), $11 for students (w/ valid ID), Free for youth (17 and under) and Legion of Honor members

Pro tip: Skip the line and book your tickets online.

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

Is this Banksy?: An Early BBC Interview Reveals More Than Just a Name

For decades, Banksy has captivated the world with provocative street art that is both enigmatic and insightful.

A BBC Radio 4 special titled “The Banksy Story” unveiled a rare audio interview with the artist, originally recorded in 2003. In this enlightening conversation, Banksy may have hinted at his true identity with a simple, yet intriguing answer – “Robbie.”

This interview delves deep into Banksy’s early exhibition, “Turf War” which became notable for its audacious display of graffitied police vehicles and a uniquely defaced portrait of Winston Churchill. Through his candid discussion, Banksy reflects on the philosophies that shape his art, emphasizing its transitory nature and his indifferent stance towards the commercial art market.



The blog post further explores Banksy’s perspective on graffiti as a form of art and vandalism, his critique of the ‘Brit Art’ movement, and his surprising reaction to his artworks’ high auction prices. Through these insights, Banksy continues to challenge societal norms and provoke thought, remaining an influential figure in both art and culture.

For a deeper exploration of Banksy’s rare interview and his impact on the art world, visit the full article here.


Artworks from the exhibition “Turf War”:

Bird and Grenade


Crude Oil Jerry


Drip Dinner


More: 24 artworks by Banksy: Who Is The Visionary of Street Art


Would you rather know Banksy’s identity or anonymously enjoy a lifetime of his art?

.fb-background-color {
background: #ffffff !important;
}
.fb_iframe_widget_fluid_desktop iframe {
width: 100% !important;
}

Source link

Read More

Top Collectors Found The Warehouse Dallas Art Foundation

[ad_1]

Dallas-based mega-collector Howard Rachofsky, a former hedge fund manager and fixture of ARTnews’s Top 200 Collectors list, is teaming up with a collector some 40 years his junior, Thomas Hartland-Mackie, to start The Warehouse Dallas Art Foundation, a non-profit arts foundation at The Warehouse, an 18,000 square foot exhibition space in a former storage facility that Rachofsky opened in 2012.

The new foundation, which, according to a statement, has been formed to ensure an educational mission of both collections, will officially debut in February with an exhibition of works from both collections. Admission will be free.

Related Articles

Rachofsky has long been a fixture of the Dallas art scene and a fan of collaboration. In 2005, he and his wife Cindy were one of several prominent collecting families in the city that pledged to donate their entire collections to the Dallas Museum of Art up their death. (Rachofsky also promised the museum his home, designed by starchitect Richard Meier.) Rachosfky co-founded The Warehouse with fellow collector and DMA board member Vernon Faulconer; the space showed both of their collections until Faulconer’s death in 2015.

“There were a lot of ideas that I had that I couldn’t execute or wasn’t in a position to,” Rachofsky told ARTnews in a joint interview with Hartland Mackie. “And, being pragmatic, I just turned 80. That’s not old anymore, but it’s not young. The Warehouse and places like it—that really offer opportunities to meet artists, to meet curators, to explore ideas institutionally—is pretty difficult to do.”

Rachofsky’s collection, accumulated over decades, numbers some 1,200 artworks, primarily by American and European post-war artists. Hartland-Mackie, meanwhile, began collecting over ten years ago. Like Rachofsky, has served on the board of the DMA. As CEO of the Labora Global Ltd., he oversees his family’s investments and philanthropic activities; he collects art in collaboration with family members and has built the Hartland & Mackie/Labora Collection, which now consists in 300 contemporary artworks.

Under the umbrella of The Warehouse Dallas Art Foundation, Rachofsky and Hartland-Mackie will use the exhibition space to show works from both of their collections, as well as artworks borrowed artists and from other collections, and put on shows from outside curators.

“In our way we are helping to bring more of the art world to Dallas, which Howard has already been instrumental in doing,” Hartland-Mackie said.

The foundation had a soft opening during last week’s Two by Two auction, an event the Rachofskys have held in their home for the past 25 years that benefits both the Dallas Museum of Art and amfAR. (This year’s event, however, was the last, and it went out with a bang, with Alan Cumming as host and a performance by Chaka Khan.) Curators from the DMA organized an exhibition at The Warehouse celebrating 25 years of Two by Two, made up of works the museum has acquired with funds from the benefit auction over the years.

In February, The Warehouse Dallas Art Foundation will have its official debut, with an exhibition of works from Rachofsky and Hartland-Mackie’s collections that will include pieces by Anicka Yi, Wade Guyton, Cavin Marcus, Rashid Johnson, Dana Schutz, Philippe Parreno, Pierre Huyghe, Marguerite Humeau, Carrol Dunham, and Howardina Pindell, and will be curated by Hartland-Mackie’s art adviser Benjamin Godsill and Thomas Feulmer, The Warehouse’s in-house curator. There will also be, as Rachofsky put it, “a little influence from Thomas and I to put some seasoning on it.”

Hartland-Mackie said his passion for Dallas comes from living there during college and for some years afterwards. He has since moved to Costa Rica with his family, but his mother lives in Dallas. “It’s got a great group of people who are tremendously philanthropic in the arts,” he said. Two by Two, he added, was one of the things that inspired him to start an art collection. “It was a way for me to see amazing artwork and get to understand a little bit more about that world, and start to buy some art in a way that felt like, Okay, I’m supporting some great artists, but I’m also supporting great causes. Through that, I built a relationship with Howard and started to learn from him.”

Rachofsky and Hartland-Mackie went on to buy artworks together, which Rachofsky characterized as “usually installation-based, works that were difficult to house.” Hartland-Mackie said he is looking forward to using the Warehouse to show precisely those kinds of works.

“As stewards of these artworks, it makes me sad that we have so much work in storage and in some cases has sat there since I acquired it,” Hartland-Mackie said. “Things that are hard to show in domestic settings. I have this amazing Philippe Parreno Christmas tree that we can’t wait to install at some point.”

The collectors emphasized that education will be a big part of the foundation’s mission. Caitlin Overton, who oversees education for The Warehouse, will work for the foundation on community outreach as well as schools.

“The idea of the foundation is really to give [the collection] a long-term future, an indefinite future, if you will and not to just terminate when I’m terminated, so to speak.” Rachofsky said.

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

Gérard Depardieu absent as sexual assault trial begins | Gérard Depardieu

[ad_1]

The trial of Gérard Depardieu on sexual assault charges has opened in Paris in the absence of the French actor, who has declared himself to be ill.

His lawyer Jérémie Assous said earlier that the 75-year-old was “extremely affected” by ill health and that he had asked for the proceedings to be delayed until he could attend in person.

“Unfortunately, his doctors have forbidden him from appearing here today,” Assous said on arrival for the trial. He said would ask the court for a six-month suspension of the trial, which comes after numerous other complaints and with a possible second court case already lying in wait. However, the proceedings opened in Depardieu’s absence.

Depardieu is being tried on charges of sexually assaulting two women while shooting the 2021 film Les Volets Verts (The Green Shutters).

Depardieu, an icon of French cinema who has appeared in more than 200 films, has denied accusations that he aggressively groped and made explicit sexual remarks to the women – a set designer and an assistant director. In an open letter published last year, he said: “Never, but never, have I abused a woman.”

The actor is the highest-profile figure to face accusations in French cinema’s version of the #MeToo movement, triggered in 2017 by allegations against the US producer Harvey Weinstein.

The names of the two women at the centre of Monday’s trial have not been made public. The set designer reported in February that she was subjected to sexual assault, sexual harassment and sexist insults while filming Les Volets Verts, directed by Jean Becker, in a private house in Paris.

The plaintiff’s lawyer, Carine Durrieu-Diebolt, told Agence France-Presse: “I expect the justice system to be the same for everybody and for Monsieur Depardieu not to receive special treatment just because he’s an artist.”

Assous previously said Depardieu’s defence would offer “witnesses and evidence that will show he has simply been targeted by false accusations”. He accused the plaintiff of attempting to “make money” by claiming €30,000 (£25,000) in compensation.

The plaintiff told the French investigative website Mediapart that during the shoot Depardieu started loudly calling for a cooling fan because he “couldn’t even get it up” in the heat.

She claimed the actor went on to boast that he could “give women an orgasm without touching them”. The plaintiff alleged that an hour later she was “brutally grabbed” by Depardieu as she was walking off the set. The actor pinned her by “closing his legs” around her before groping her waist and her stomach and continuing up to her breasts, she said.

Depardieu made “obscene remarks” during the incident, she said, including: “Come and touch my big parasol. I’ll stick it in your pussy.” She described the actor’s bodyguards dragging him away as he shouted: “We’ll see each other again, my dear.”

Durrieu-Diebolt said: “My client expects that the justice system will find Gérard Depardieu to be a serial sexual assaulter.”

The second plaintiff in the case, an assistant director on the same film, also alleges sexual violence.

Anouk Grinberg, an actor who appeared in Les Volets Verts, told AFP that Depardieu used “salacious words … from morning till night”.

“When producers hired Depardieu to work on a film, they knew they were hiring an assaulter,” she said. Grinberg said that in her experience Depardieu had “always used sexual, smutty language”, but that his behaviour had become “much, much worse, with permission from his profession, that pays him for it and covers up his offences”.

About 20 women have accused Depardieu of various sexual offences. The actor Charlotte Arnould was the first to file a criminal complaint. A judge has yet to rule on a request from prosecutors in August for Depardieu to stand trial for raping and sexually assaulting her.

An investigation is under way in Paris after a former production assistant accused Depardieu of a sexual assault in 2014. The actor Hélène Darras filed a sexual assault complaint that fell foul of the statute of limitations. The Spanish writer and journalist Ruth Baza has accused Depardieu of raping her in 1995.

In December last year the French president, Emmanuel Macron, shocked feminists by complaining of a “manhunt” targeting Depardieu, whom he called a “towering actor” who “makes France proud”.

Macron’s remarks followed the broadcast by an investigative TV show of a recording of Depardieu making repeated misogynistic and insulting remarks about women.

Depardieu is the biggest star to face accusations in French cinema’s #MeToo movement. The directors Jacques Doillon and Benoît Jacquot are among other prominent figures accused of sexual violence. Doillon and Jacquot have denied the allegations.

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

friendswithyou’s autonomous fuzzy robots play healing sounds inside cleveland public library

[ad_1]

autonomous robots play sounds in cleveland public library

 

FriendsWithYou, the art collaboration of Samuel Borkson and Arturo Sandoval III, plants five moving and autonomous fuzzy robots inside the Cleveland Public Library. They’re called The BAND, and they’re programmed with AI and to interact with the visitors and vice versa. They play healing frequencies and sounds as they rotate, spin, and ‘dance.’ Visitors are free to touch them, and they even have buttons around their fuzzy bodies that can be pressed.

 

Each member of the BAND, which stands for Biodigital Autonomous Neuro Dancers, has individual names stemming from numerology and frequencies (ROC, ETZ, LIX, PMJ, and FUR). As they move around Cleveland Public Library’s hall, they perform their ballet, a personalized program by FriendsWithYou, to the symphony of sounds by the artists’s long-time collaborator, Norman Bambi. The public art is on view in the library’s hall beginning October 26th, 2024.

first three photos by Catherine Young, while the rest is by Patrick Fenner, both courtesy of FriendsWith You

 

 

Friendswithyou’s robots can help the public connect with AI

 

FriendsWithYou’s five fuzzy autonomous robots have five vibrant hair colors: yellow, blue, purple, pink, and green. They light up inside the Cleveland Public Library hall because the circular buttons around their bodies are switched on as they move around their space. They are soft to touch, and they seem to have their own thinking as they avoid ramming through people; they instead stop and rotate while playing ambient-like sounds that are connected with healing frequencies. During its opening on October 26th, families came to the library to experience petting the five fuzzy robots’ furry bodies and listen to the sound beats reverberating in the hall.

 

FriendsWithYou has their fuzzy robots playing healing frequencies because they want the public to have a joyful connection and experience with AI. For the duo Samuel Borkson and Arturo Sandoval III, the evolving technology can be a catalyst for deep human and digital relationships, away from how some internet users paint it as takeover machines. With The BAND, the duo hopes to showcase a more positive use of AI and advanced technologies, that is, to provide and co-create communal experiences with the public. The BAND is on view for one year in the Main Library in Brett Hall at the Cleveland Public Library, produced in collaboration with LAND Studio and Deeplocal.

friendswithyou autonomous robots cleveland
FriendsWithYou plants five moving and autonomous fuzzy robots inside the Cleveland Public Library

friendswithyou autonomous robots cleveland
FriendsWithYou names their five autonomous robots in Cleveland Public Library ‘The BAND’

friendswithyou autonomous robots cleveland
these autonomous robots in Cleveland Public Library plays healing frequencies

connecting more with AI
FriendsWithYou hopes that their autonomous robots can help visitors connect more with AI

inside Cleveland Public Library
view of FriendsWithYou’s autonomous robots inside Cleveland Public Library

 

opening day of the exhibition



[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

‘The worse the world gets, the better for this play’: Armando Iannucci on staging Dr Strangelove with Steve Coogan | Theatre

[ad_1]

‘Gentlemen, you can’t fight in here, this is the War Room!” In fact, it is a rehearsal studio on an autumn afternoon, but let’s not quibble. This is where Steve Coogan and the rest of the cast are running through a new stage version of Stanley Kubrick’s 1964 satire Dr Strangelove. Watching over them is their director Sean Foley and his co-adapter, Armando Iannucci, who together resemble a tall, gruff bricklayer and his short, smiley mate.

The actors pace around in front of an as yet unpainted wooden set, which revolves to reveal the office of General Ripper, played on screen by the peremptory Sterling Hayden and here by John Hopkins. As the scene unfolds, Ripper barks down the phone at the stiff-upper-lipped Group Captain Lionel Mandrake, played by Coogan, who is feebly clutching a computer printout in front of his face.

It is Ripper’s mental breakdown that sets in motion a cataclysmic chain of events beginning with the launching of US missiles at the Soviet Union. The rest of this abyss-black comedy follows the efforts to intercept or otherwise thwart these apparently unstoppable nukes as Armageddon looms. Columbia Pictures, thrilled at the sight of Peter Sellers donning various disguises in Kubrick’s 1962 adaptation of Lolita, stipulated that the actor should assume multiple roles in the film. He played Mandrake, the wheedling US president Merkin Muffley, and the sinister nuclear boffin Dr Strangelove. He was also lined up for a fourth role – Major Kong, the B-52 pilot eventually played by Slim Pickens, and memorably seen riding a warhead as though it were a bucking bronco – but an ankle injury put paid to that.

Coogan, who has frequently been compared to Sellers, and narrowly missed out on playing the Pink Panther star in a 2004 biopic (Geoffrey Rush pipped him to the post), is going one better than his idol and taking on all four parts. Among the photographs pinned to the studio wall today is one showing him in a Stetson, riding the missile as Major Kong. “Steve playing all those roles will add a bravura quality to the story,” says Foley as he and Iannucci take their seats in this basement room in London that is not unlike a nuclear bunker.

Missed out on a nuke ride ... Peter Sellers in Kubrick’s 1964 film. Photograph: PictureLux/The Hollywood Archive/Alamy

There is the added complication that some of Coogan’s characters appear together in the same scene. Muffley and Dr Strangelove, for instance, are both in the War Room simultaneously. “Yeah,” Foley says, sucking the air through his teeth. “Could you tell us how to do that?”

A minor detail. What matters is that the sensibility of the original should be intact. As the novelist Kazuo Ishiguro has written, the movie is “a remarkable blend of things that shouldn’t go together … Kubrick created the darkest vision you could have of nuclear war and combined it with out-and-out comedy.”

That wasn’t how it started. Kubrick was adapting Peter George’s suspense novel Red Alert when it struck him that the extremity of its doomsday scenario demanded to be treated irreverently. The Cuban missile crisis had only recently abated when he enlisted Terry Southern, author of the comic novel The Magic Christian (which Sellers had given to Kubrick), to tease out the funny side of the impending apocalypse.

Selling it as a laugh riot presented another sort of challenge. Mo Rothman, the head of Columbia Pictures, told Kubrick: “The publicity department is having a hard time getting a handle on how to promote a comedy about the destruction of the planet.” Some critics found the movie too strange to love. Bosley Crowther in the New York Times called it “malefic and sick”. Says Foley now: “We can only hope.”

Fun at Elon Musk’s expense … Iannucci, left, with director Sean Foley. Photograph: Sarah Lee/The Guardian

Any shock value has surely diminished. “I doubt the audience will be saying, ‘You shouldn’t make jokes about that!’” says Iannucci. “Hopefully the play is a reminder of the stakes involved in all this. We look on people like Trump as a sort of entertainment, whereas the decisions they make in power have global consequences. It’s not just 30-second clips on TikTok.”

Both men harbour a lifelong love of Kubrick’s movie. Iannucci was born two months before it opened. “So he wasn’t at the premiere,” Foley points out. “I first saw it on video and loved it,” says Iannucci, who knows a thing or two himself about the comedy of brinkmanship, having created the political sitcoms Veep and The Thick of It, and directed The Death of Stalin.

He also co-created The Day Today, the 1990s news parody in which Chris Morris’s Paxman-esque presenter escalates an innocuous item about a peace treaty into a declaration of global war. That episode is pure Dr Strangelove, as is the scene from In the Loop, the cinematic spin-off of The Thick of It, in which a US general works out the viability of a potential war using a pink talking calculator.

“The American release of In the Loop had a Dr Strangelove-type poster,” Iannucci recalls. “And the French producers of The Death of Stalin told me they thought it had a Strangelove-esque feel. I’ve always admired things like Brazil or The Great Dictator: that idea of themes that are so immense that we can only respond in an absurdist way. Take the scene in Dr Strangelove where Mandrake needs to call the president to stop World War III but he has run out of change. That’s a great comedy situation.”

Riding a bomb like it’s a bucking bronco … the famous ending of Dr Strangelove. Photograph: Photo 12/Alamy

Foley believes Dr Strangelove to be Kubrick’s masterpiece. “I’m always interested in taking something that’s brilliant and doing it in another medium,” he explains. “Though it can be a poisoned chalice because people might say you’ve ruined it.” So far, so good: Foley’s stage versions of The Ladykillers (in 2011) and Withnail and I (with which he ended his tenure earlier this year as artistic director of Birmingham Rep) were both greeted warmly.

“Ideally, people will leave not quite knowing which bits were new and which were from the film,” says Iannucci. “When the Kubrick estate was looking over the script, there were lines where they had to go back and check whether they were in the film or not. That’s a good sign.”

Some elements were crying out to be overhauled. “The film is a satire on maleness and power as well as politics and the arms race,” says Foley. “There’s only one real female character, though: a bikini-clad secretary who’s having an affair with one of the generals.” Iannucci winces: “Different times,” he says.

Rich part … Coogan in the title role. Photograph: Manuel Harlan

“We didn’t think there was any way of staging that today,” Foley continues, “but then that would make it a show with only men in it.” A solution arose in the unlikely form of Vera Lynn, whose rendition of We’ll Meet Again provides the film with its bitterly ironic punchline, and who now appears as a character, played by Penny Ashmore. “She gets dropped on Russia,” jokes Iannucci.

As if anyone needed reminding that the real world is scarcely more stable than the one depicted on stage, the US election will take place early in the run, and is sure to provide an extra frisson. “The worse the world gets, the better it is for the play,” Foley says.

Even without that, there is the spectre of Elon Musk, who, in his propensity for making the planet a more volatile place, could easily have stepped out of the world of Dr Strangelove. “You can have fun at Musk’s expense,” says Iannucci. “But I find it menacing that people in charge of information are prioritising rumours and lies that conform to their point of view.” In recent months, he has been needling Musk whenever possible for the benefit of his almost 700,000 followers on X. “Call it Twitter!” he says, thumping a fist on the table in mock fury. He denies he is mounting any kind of sustained campaign of irritation against the platform’s owner. “I’m just sitting down of an evening, seeing him on there and going, ‘Ah, fuck it.’”

On the day we meet, Taylor Swift has just come out in support of Kamala Harris, signing her endorsement statement: “Childless cat lady.” Musk responded by tweeting: “Fine Taylor … you win … I will give you a child …” Iannucci shakes his head in dismay. “You just go, ‘What? Are you threatening to impregnate someone? Just because you run this company, you feel you can write whatever you want?’”

I ask whether he’ll be putting aside a couple of tickets for Musk on opening night.

“There must be a restricted view,” he says. “Let’s give him that.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

‘I wanted a hit!’ Bryan Ferry on recording Slave to Love in Bette Midler’s house | Pop and rock

[ad_1]

Bryan Ferry, singer, songwriter

I’m not a musical detective, but I’d put my money on the inspiration for Slave to Love coming from Prisoner of Love by the Ink Spots, which I heard when I was five. My Auntie Enid’s husband was stationed in Europe with the armed forces and I think he picked up American records and brought the Ink Spots home. I still have the 78 RPM single.

I wrote the lyrics in a hotel room in New York, while pacing the floor at night. I’d done more esoteric things in the past, but I wanted something simple and memorable, a song for everyone. A hit! The first line – “Tell her I’ll be waiting / In the usual place / With the tired and weary / And there’s no escape” – set the scene.

Play that funky cowbell … the artwork for Slave to Love

I’d loved being in Roxy Music but, going solo, the world was my oyster. We had assembled a team of big guns, people like David Gilmour (guitar), David Sanborn (saxophone) and Nile Rodgers (guitar). Neil Jason had a swing to his bass-playing that suited the track down to the ground. Neil Hubbard had the most wonderfully soulful tone and we recorded him early on to build the song around him. The guitar solo in the middle is actually three interweaving guitarists: Gilmour, Keith Scott and Hubbard.

I did the video in Paris with Jean-Baptiste Mondino. It was beautifully filmed, with a certain chicness – all these beautiful girls and me in the background, which was how I liked to be. At the end of the video, I’m hugging a child, like a long-lost daughter or something. Good twist. It turned out this child actor was the daughter of someone I’d had dinner with, along with Salvador Dalí, in 1973.

When I performed the song for the first time, at Live Aid, the drummer broke his snare-drum skin, the bass was in a different tuning, Gilmour’s guitar wasn’t working properly, and someone had to tape another mic to mine because it wasn’t audible. But despite all that, the song took off pretty quickly and has been in lots of films. It’s fabulous when people identify with your feelings about something.

Rhett Davies, producer

I first met Bryan when I engineered a track on his 1974 solo album Another Time, Another Place. Then in 1979, when Roxy had got back together, I was pulled in to do a week’s work on the Manifesto album and stayed for 40 years. We had found a way to cut Dance Away, which they’d tried before but hadn’t pulled off. I suggested laying down a keyboard and rhythm box and building it up from there. As Roxy’s sound evolved from Manifesto to Flesh and Blood to Avalon, we kept that way of working.

Bryan’s Boys and Girls album felt like a continuation, just without Roxy. We started working on it at his house in Sussex with simply his voice and his CP-80 electric piano. We went to a studio in London called the White House, then went to Bette Midler’s house in New York. She’d had trouble sleeping and had built a soundproof room, so we set a studio up in there.

It was one of the most difficult tracks to finish and it went through a lot of lives. In the chorus, there’s a little keyboard phrase that came from another track we never got to finish, so we moved it into Slave to Love. Bryan loves having something straightforwardly passionate throughout a song, and on this one it was a cowbell. The drummer, Omar Hakim, recorded the big snare drum sounds in New York’s Power Station studios’ stairwell, which had a famous reverb.

Bryan was still working on the lyrics so the vocals came last, and it was the last track we finished for the album. Bob Clearmountain [mixing engineer] mixed it so many times in so many studios. He remembers falling asleep in Air Studios mixing it even more. It was finally finished at three in the afternoon. When we heard the completed song, there was just elation. When I listen to it now, I wouldn’t change a thing.

Bryan Ferry’s Retrospective: Selected Recordings 1973-2023 is out now

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

A Modern Extension Expands a Mid-Century House in Winchester

[ad_1]

AR Design Studio has brought new life to a mid-century home in Winchester, United Kingdom, creating a seamless blend of the original 1970s design with a fresh contemporary extension. Known as The Seventies House, this project involved both restoring the house and garden, which had fallen into neglect, and adding a 1,012-square-foot addition designed to celebrate the lush landscape that surrounds the property.

Originally, the home’s garden was a defining feature, developed by the previous owner, a local horticulturalist, and brimming with mature trees and dense shrubs. However, years of neglect had left it overgrown. AR Design Studio was tasked with rejuvenating the garden, trimming back the foliage and reintroducing new plantings, while relocating elements like the home’s original 70s rockery, or rock garden, to make room for the new extension.

Modern glass-walled house with a garden in front, set against a brick building and a clear blue sky.

Modern house with large glass windows, wood accents, and a car parked beside it. Surrounded by grass and trees under a clear blue sky.

Modern extension on a traditional house with large glass windows, surrounded by greenery under a clear blue sky.

Modern house extension with large glass windows, surrounded by greenery. Outdoor seating area on the patio. Clear blue sky above.

The architectural intervention on the house itself introduces a striking contrast. While the original structure showcases the vibrant colors and furniture typical of mid-century design, the extension presents a clean, minimalist approach. A long, asymmetric form stretches along the northern side of the house, with an elegant wooden canopy extending to the west. This overhang not only adds architectural interest but also provides shade and protection from the elements.

Modern patio with glass walls, outdoor dining table, and chairs. Surrounded by potted plants and greenery, under a clear blue sky.

Modern house with a glass extension, featuring a dining table and chairs on a concrete patio, surrounded by plants, set against a clear blue sky and green foliage.

A modern building with large glass windows, a wooden exterior, and potted pink flowers on a concrete patio. Lush greenery surrounds the area.

Spacious dining area with a wooden table, chairs, and pendant light. Large windows open to a garden view. Minimalist decor with plants on a sideboard.

Inside, the extension prioritizes openness and flexibility. The new space features an expansive kitchen, living, and dining area, making it ideal for both everyday family life and hosting larger gatherings. The use of sliding glass walls creates a strong connection between the interior and the garden, flooding the space with natural light and enhancing the sense of openness.

Modern dining room with a wooden table, eight chairs, pendant lights, and large windows overlooking a garden. The room is bright and minimalistic, featuring a lounge area with sofas.

Minimalist dining area with a wooden table, chairs, and pendant lights. Large windows offer a view of a lush garden. Brown sofas and a rug are visible in the background.

Modern open living space with a brown leather chair, sofa, and dining table. Floor-to-ceiling glass doors open to a green outdoor area. Neutral tones and indoor plants accent the room.

The minimalist interior design allows the garden to take center stage. A neutral palette and sleek, clean lines give the space a calming, contemporary feel. White pocket doors allow flexible partitioning between the kitchen and living areas, offering privacy when needed but opening the house up to light during the day. The furnishings pay homage to the home’s original mid-century character, creating a balance between old and new.

A modern kitchen with a central island, three wooden stools, and built-in appliances. Light wooden cabinets and a large window provide a spacious, airy feel. A rug is on the floor.

A light wood is used throughout the kitchen, offering a textured and warm contrast to the large gray tiles on the floor. The tiles extend out to the wraparound patio further enhancing the seamless indoor/outdoor connection. Even in the bathrooms, the mid-century spirit persists, with modern interpretations of the bold colors and design elements that defined the era. Overall, the The Seventies House transformation carefully maintains its mid-century charm while offering a new, spacious environment that draws the beauty of the garden indoors.

Modern kitchen with large glass window, wooden cabinetry, an island with three stools, stainless steel appliances, and a woven rug on the floor. Garden view outside.

Modern kitchen with light wood cabinetry, large central island with stools, and floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking a garden. A textured rug lies on the floor.

Modern bathroom with a glass-enclosed shower, white tile walls, a wooden vanity with an oval sink, and a window providing natural light. The shower features a gold rainfall showerhead.

Modern bathroom with a freestanding bathtub, round mirror, wooden vanity with a sink, and a glass-enclosed shower. The walls are tiled, and there is a window overlooking greenery.

Bathroom with blue tiled walls, wooden door, wooden vanity, round sink, and a modern toilet.

Modern bathroom with blue tiled walls, a wooden vanity with a round sink, wall-mounted faucets, and a walk-in shower with a rainfall showerhead.

A bathroom with blue tiled walls features a wooden vanity with a round sink, wall-mounted faucet, and a wooden cabinet above.

A modern two-story house with large windows is illuminated at night, surrounded by trees and a lawn under a partially cloudy sky.

Original house:

A two-story house with brown shingles partially covered in greenery, surrounded by overgrown grass and plants under a cloudy sky.

A two-story brick house with large windows, surrounded by overgrown grass and lush trees, under a clear blue sky.

For more projects from AR Design Studio, visit ardesignstudio.co.uk.

Photography by Martin Gardner.

Caroline Williamson is Editor-in-Chief of Design Milk. She has a BFA in photography from SCAD and can usually be found searching for vintage wares, doing New York Times crossword puzzles in pen, or reworking playlists on Spotify.



[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

New York Art Reviews by John Haber

[ad_1]

These have been tough times for art criticism. Just this spring and just here in New York, Roberta Smith announced her retirement from The New York Times. Not two years before, in October 2022, Peter Schjeldahl died of lung cancer at age eighty.

The double blow means so much more coming from such prominent and reliable writers at essential publications. Smith has been co-chief critic at The Times since 2011, where she has built a top-level roster, but no one cuts to the quick like her. Schjeldahl began writing for The New Yorker in 1998. Each had come to the right place. How many other newspapers have taken daily or weekly criticism as an imperative, and what other magazine would give a critic a two-page spread as often as he liked? The loss of their most influential voices should have anyone asking what else has changed.

They have left behind a changing critical landscape—one that they could never have foreseen or intended. It values artists more than their art, as seeming friends and real celebrities. It covers the business of art, without challenging art as a business. It cares more about rankings than seeing. It gives all the more reason to look back and to take stock. Good critics, when you can still find them, are looking better and better.

Peter Schjeldahl could see his death coming—clearly enough that he announced it himself, in place of a review, as “The Art of Dying.” It shows his insistence on speaking from his perspective while demanding something more, about art and language, and it lends its name to one last book of his criticism. He had been a poet, fans like to point out, and he must have seen the same imperative in poetry as well, just as for William Wordsworth reaching for first principles on long walks across north England’s Lake District. Schjeldahl quickly took back his finality, perhaps overwhelmed by letters of sympathy and offers to replace him. Death was not so easily dissuaded.

He was a stylist, but not to call attention to himself. He was not one to wallow in the first person at the expense of art. Rather, his point of view helped him engage the reader and to share his insights. One essay described his “struggles” with Paul Cézanne, which must sound like sacrilege in light of the artist’s place in the canon. And then one remembers that Cézanne painted not just landscape, portraits, and still life, but his struggle with painting itself—what Maurice Merleau-Ponty called “Cézanne’s Doubt.” Schjeldahl, too, had his doubts, and they led him to unforeseen conclusions.

He was most at home with someone like Cézanne, at the birth of modern art. Still, his interests ranged from Jan van Eyck, in a memorable article on restoration of The Ghent Altarpiece, to art in the galleries. Roberta Smith, in turn, was mostly content to leave art history to her fellow chief critic, Holland Cotter. I shall always remember her instead as literally climbing over contemporary art, in a photo together with Kim Levin from their days at the Village Voice. It gets me going each year through my own self-guided tours of summer sculpture in New York’s great outdoors. Smith, though, never does get personal, and she is not just out for a good time.

She had a way of landing at the center of things, going back to jobs at Paula Cooper, the first gallery in Soho, and The Times, where she had freelanced before coming on staff in 1991. She promises to keep going to galleries, too, “just to look.” Yet she has a way of expressing her doubts, serious doubts, about what she praises and what she seeks out. All that “on the other hand” can make her a less graceful writer, but it keeps her open-minded and critical. So what's NEW!It is particularly welcome at a publication eager to suppress doubts in favor of hit counts. But I return to trends at The Times and elsewhere in a moment.

This could be a time not to mourn or to bury writers, but to celebrate. There have been worse in the past, and there will be strong voices in the future. Those old enough to remember Hilton Kramer at The Times will still cringe at his dismissal of postwar American art. His colleague, Grace Glueck, dutifully soldiered on despite obstacles to women. (John Russell brought a welcome change, and I still consult his survey text in The Meanings of Modern Art.) Besides, no critic can make or break a publication.

Smith had already brought on Jason Farago, who revives an old approach to art history going back to John Canady in the 1960s, walking a reader through a painting one detail at a time. It works well with interactive Web pages in the present. Cotter remains as well, at least for now, free to focus on what matters most to him—diversity in artists, especially gays and Latin Americans. With its typical care, The New Yorker took more than a year to come up with a successor to Schjeldahl, and it did well. Jackson Arn teems with insights, enough to have me wondering what is left for me to say, and, like Schjeldahl, he is not above telling one-liners. And yet something else, too, has changed that could defeat them all—and that is so important that I leave it to a separate post next time and to my latest upload.

Read more, now in a feature-length article on this site.

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More
TOP