‘Sabbath’s Theater’ Review: John Turturro Embodies a Life and a Libido

[ad_1]

Maybe so. But novels aren’t plays. And prose isn’t dialogue. Words that live comfortably on the page turn awkward and overly formal in the mouths of the actors. This version, a monologue with interruptions, shifts constantly between dialogue and direct address, the better to maintain Roth’s language. In this container, the drama stagnates, weighed down by Sabbath’s solipsistic gripes. (The adapters, in one decisive excision, have stripped those gripes of racism.)

In his youth, Sabbath tells us, he was a guerrilla provocateur, the mastermind of a company called Sabbath’s Indecent Theater. If only some of that formal anarchy had infused this production. Where are the puppets, the street theater tactics? Jo Bonney is a sensitive and inventive director, yet here invention fails her. She offers a mostly spare stage, neatly delineated by Jeff Croiter’s clever lighting design and Alex Basco Koch’s dull projections, and a steady march from scene to scene as Sabbath, already a self-described “degenerate,” degenerates further. Yet not too far.

As Sabbath says, in the middle of the play and again at the end, “To everyone I have ever horrified, to the appalled who’d consider me a dangerous man, loathsome, degenerate and gross. Not at all! My failure is failing to have gone far enough!” Agreed. I am a highly shockable sort of person. Still I can’t say that I ever felt truly scandalized or even absolutely engaged, most likely because the characters and situations remain unreal, tethered to the page. A brief scene of Sabbath trying to pleasure himself with his arthritic fingers was at least funny.

If “Sabbath’s Theater” offers a limited tour of the human psyche, it succeeds as a tour de force for Turturro and for Marvel, too. (Jason Kravits is perfectly capable in a number of roles, most of them thankless.) As Sabbath, Turturro is shifty, kinetic, with a bend in the knees and a shrug in the shoulders, ferocious in his loathing and desire. His performance is vivid, visceral in a way that transcends the prose. Marvel, who is never anything less than glorious, enfleshes characters who might otherwise seem merely male projections. In contrast to Turturro’s arm-waving defiance, she offers an effortless stillness and a great capacity for joy. Her characters are fully human and quietly life-affirming, counterparts to Sabbath’s peculiar death drive.

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

Ukrainian Officials Say Russia Bombed Mariupol Theater Sheltering ‘Hundreds’

[ad_1]

Ukrainian officials said Wednesday that Russian troops bombed a theater in the southern port city of Mariupol where “hundreds” of people had been sheltering from the ongoing Russian attack.

The Russian word for “children” was painted on the pavement in huge white letters on two sides of the building, according to satellite imagery from Maxars.

There was no immediate information on the number of injuries or deaths.

Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Dmytro Kuleba said the Drama Theater had been destroyed, calling it a “horrendous war crime.”

“Russians could not have not known this was a civilian shelter,” Kuleba said in a tweet.

While critics of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine have been calling him a “war criminal” for weeks, on Wednesday U.S. President Joe Biden joined them.

“He’s a war criminal,” Biden said plainly.

Russian troops have been laying siege to Mariupol for about two weeks, encircling the city and largely preventing civilians from leaving. Electricity, food, water and medicine are all running out. It’s a medieval tactic that Putin has used before with devastating consequences in Aleppo, Syria, in 2016 and in Grozny, Chechnya, in 2000.

The plight of Mariupol has been chronicled for the Western world by two Associated Press journalists, who believe they are the only international members of the press still in the city. People have been melting snow for drinking water, they report, and venturing out only for essentials before returning to wherever they are sheltering from the persistent shelling.

The number of casualties is unknown because it is often too dangerous to venture out to find the wounded and the dead; the official number is around 2,400, according to The New York Times.

Russia claims that its forces are not targeting or killing civilians, but Russian artillery has decimated apartment buildings and hospitals, and killed people along evacuation routes.

Ukrainian officials say Russian troops took 500 people ― about 100 doctors and patients and 400 people who lived in houses nearby ― hostage at one hospital in Mariupol late Tuesday. The troops allegedly rounded up neighbors and drove them to the hospital, using gunfire to prevent anyone from trying to leave.

In the northern Ukrainian city of Chernihiv, Russians “shot and killed 10 people standing in line for bread,” the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv said Wednesday.

The International Criminal Court at The Hague announced earlier this month that it was investigating whether war crimes were being committed by the Russians. Part of the rationale Putin has used to justify his invasion was a purported “genocide” in the eastern part of Ukraine, but the United Nations’ International Court of Justice said Wednesday that its investigation had found no evidence of such a genocide.

In a largely symbolic gesture, the ICJ ordered Russia to halt its assault.



[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

‘Treason,’ the Musical, Was Built on an Online Foundation

[ad_1]

The catchy, folk-tinged numbers from “Treason the Musical” have been streamed online over a million times, in 96 countries. Its fans — known as “Plotters” — have been listening to an EP, an acoustic record and a live album of the songs, as well as sharing their own performances on TikTok. But until this fall, there hadn’t even been a full-scale production of the show.

Unlike “Beetlejuice,” “Heathers” or “Dear Evan Hansen,” which all parlayed onstage popularity into huge digital followings, “Treason” is turning the formula for musical success around. Its producers cultivated an online fandom for three years before raising the curtain on the show, and are now banking on those fans buying theater tickets, too.

It seems to be working. “Treason” is currently on a 27-show tour of Britain that culminates in two performances at London’s largest theater, the 2,286-seater Palladium, on Nov. 21-22.

Created by Ricky Allan, the musical tells the story of the Gunpowder Plot of 1605: a failed attempt by a group of persecuted English Catholics to blow up the Houses of Parliament in London and assassinate the protestant King James I. The show features folk ballads, rousing pop and rock numbers, and spoken word and rap, with period costumes — ruffs and capes, doublets and hose — and candle-like lighting to evoke a 17th-century setting.

As an original retelling of an episode from English history, “Treason” brings to mind another grass-roots British success story: “Six,” the hit musical about the wives of King Henry VIII. “Six” started out as a scrappy student show in the Edinburgh Fringe and grew into a professional production that is playing on the West End and Broadway. Its cast album became the second-most streamed of all time (after “Hamilton”), and its Instagram account has more followers than any West End show ever.

Building a so-called “Queendom” of fans was essential to the success of “Six,”, said Josh Bird, the show’s digital producer. “Very early on, we made the effort in replying to every comment, every message, but also encouraging the cast and creative team to do that,” he said. “So it created this online community that were part of the journey.”

When Allan was developing “Treason,” in 2020, he called on performers with existing online fan bases, including Hadley Fraser and Ramin Karimloo, who shared the show’s songs on social media as they evolved. The fans followed along as “Treason” came together into a recording, a streamed concert and two sold-out live concert performances in London.

“It wasn’t without risks. We were letting audiences in on something that wasn’t finished,” Allan said. “The risk has paid off, but it’s definitely been an interesting way round.”

Trevor Boffone, a lecturer at the University of Houston and the author of “Social Media in Musical Theater” said the sense of direct access that online platforms can provide had been a game changer for musicals. “In the TikTok age,” he said, audiences don’t need a finished product. What they care about is access to this behind-the-scenes, in-the-process footage.”

Boffone pointed to two other musical projects that started online and grew into real-world phenomena, although neither ever achieved a full stage run: “Ratatouille,” a musical version of the Pixar movie, and “The Unofficial Bridgerton Musical,” based on the Netflix show. Both became viral sensations after TikTok users suggested that those existing titles would make good musicals, and people started sharing their own songs, set designs and costume suggestions, he said.

“Ratatouille” was eventually staged as a one-off streamed production, and “Bridgerton” was released as a Grammy-winning album. (A concert version of “Bridgerton’” was shut down when Netflix filed a copyright infringement suit.)

“The more success stories we have,” Boffone said, “the more people are going to take TikTok seriously as a place to create buzz around a musical.”

Developing a show online isn’t just a creative model. Increasingly, demonstrating that a musical has an existing fan base is a way to prove commercial viability. Andy Barnes, who produced “Six” in Britain, said that producers in other countries had approached him about mounting their own productions after seeing the size of show’s online following. Broadway and the West End aside, “Six” has now been staged in countries including Australia, Canada, Germany and South Korea.

Hard data about monthly streams and shares can also help find investors. Allan said that such figures helped secure financial backing for the “Treason” tour, making it seem like a less risky proposition.

One of the “Treason” producers, Dale Franzen — who also produced “Hadestown,” another show that began with an album and had its own twisty journey to stage success — came on board ahead of the musical’s current tour. She said that she had been impressed by the approach the “Treason” team had taken to developing the show and its fan base.

“Anybody who does something differently, I’m going to be listening and watching,” Franzen said recently by phone from Los Angeles. “When I saw they went from streaming to a concert, that made a lot of sense to me,” she said. “Before spending a huge amount on a production, you know a lot more about your product.”

She said that she didn’t think the “Treason” model would work for every show. But just as fans like to feel involved, Franzen said, some investors she had approached about putting money into the show were excited by the sense of taking part in its development.

“I said, ‘This isn’t the final product; you’re seeing the process,” she said. “People love that.”



[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

‘Merry Me’ Review: A Loopy Sex Comedy Focused on Female Pleasure

[ad_1]

She borrows, too, from William Wycherley’s notoriously randy Restoration comedy “The Country Wife.” Its hero, Horner, spreads a rumor of his own impotence so he can proceed with his many liaisons unsuspected. The version of that in “Merry Me” involves Jess telling everyone that Shane has turned straight.

This lie is handy for fending off General Memnon (David Ryan Smith), who wants Shane “court marshaled for her heretically heterophobic courting habits.” It also ensures her freedom to woo women, with Sapph soon topping the list. Except that the pseudo-enlightened Willy (Ryan Spahn) is nowhere near as gullible as his father.

It’s a ridiculous, convoluted plot, with only a tenuous logic in its connection to Shane’s orgasmic quest, but there is a gleeful, almost punchy abandon to this play’s dedication to queer female pleasure, embrace of bawdy fun and relish of theatrical in-jokes.

With shout-outs to Virginia Woolf, Samuel Beckett and Thornton Wilder, “Merry Me” pilfers successfully from Shakespeare (when Sapph dons a mannish disguise that Shane sees right through) and from Tony Kushner’s “Angels in America” (which lends a glamorous, comic, sexually skilled Angel, played by Shaunette Renée Wilson). If such a mash-up smacks slightly of drama school, “Merry Me” also has a refreshingly playful spirit that established artists sometimes lose out in the world.

Rachel Hauck’s set gives an angel’s-eye view of the base camp, with rows of miniature tents arrayed on a vertical backdrop, and in fact the Angel and her winged colleagues are much concerned with goings-on there. Godlike, they caused the blackout that has paused the war. To lift it, they demand a sacrifice — and in this feminist retelling, that’s not going to be anybody’s daughter.

Pvt. Willy Memnon, they’re looking at you.

Merry Me
Through Nov. 19 at New York Theater Workshop, Manhattan; nytw.org. Running time: 1 hour 30 minutes.

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

A Union Has A Pivotal Decision To Make In This New Play

[ad_1]

The union committee at a New England textile factory has just an hour to make a decision that will affect all of the workers they were elected to represent. The committee’s spokesperson, Linda (Ebony Marshall-Oliver), the only member who was permitted in the room with management, comes out with what seems like good news: The factory’s new owners have agreed not to lay off anyone or alter any of their benefits. But the 11 committee members, all female and gender nonconforming workers, must decide whether to accept one condition: giving up seven minutes of their 15-minute break.

At first, most of the members think it’s obvious they should accept: Well, at least we still have a job. We need our jobs. But as the play goes on, they start to think about what it could mean in the long run and whether agreeing to it will open the door to more concessions, as well as whether they have the power to fight back instead of giving in.

It’s electrifying and chilling to watch, made even more searing by the intimate setting: The audience is seated around the set, which is the factory’s break room. We have an up-close view of the committee’s heated debate over the decision, and we’re also thinking through it ourselves.

That’s the premise of the new play “7 Minutes,” whose explorations of labor, capitalism, the power differential between workers and bosses, and the benefits and challenges of collective action particularly reverberate in this current moment. On Friday, Amazon warehouse workers in New York City voted to form the first union at any of the tech giant’s U.S. facilities, a historic win for the labor movement.

Unionization efforts are spreading across many industries around the country (full disclosure: I am on the union committee at HuffPost, which is unionized with the Writers Guild of America, East). Workers are banding together at many corporate behemoths where union organizing once seemed impossible, from Google to Starbucks.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated much of this organizing by exacerbating and laying bare the economic gulf between corporate bosses and their employees. It has also transformed the nature of work itself, prompting many people to reevaluate their relationship to the labor they give and what their workplace should provide in return.

“We’ve been giving concessions now for decades. And people don’t have the power to fight back. But this last year was one of these big moments of people being like, ‘F**k that.’”

- Sarah Hughes, labor journalist and organizer at Labor Notes

Socially oriented theater has long been a core mission of Waterwell, the company behind “7 Minutes” that was co-founded by “Succession” and “Inventing Anna” star Arian Moayed. Many performances of the play, which runs through Sunday at HERE Arts Center in New York City, have included post-show panels with union leaders, workers and labor scholars to discuss the play’s real-world resonance.

“Waterwell has this really cool legacy of thinking about audience in a really special way, and that is the question of: Who is seeing the play, and are we reaching beyond what can be sometimes kind of an insular arts world?” said Lee Sunday Evans, Waterwell’s artistic director. “We’re really hungry to keep having those interactions where art can be part of these dialogues around public policy, and also be an opportunity to have the kind of human connection with the issues as part of those really incredible gatherings when folks in various fields are coming together to reflect on their work.”

Waterwell’s production, in partnership with Working Theater, marks the U.S. premiere of “7 Minutes,” written by Italian playwright Stefano Massini (“The Lehman Trilogy”) and originally set at a French factory in Italy. Evans and translator Francesca Spedalieri worked together to bring it into an American context. The bones of the play remain the same, but the dialogue was modified to reflect how U.S. unions function differently and serve different purposes than those in Europe. (One grimly comical change: Because Italy has universal health care, the workers in the original version would not face the threat of losing their health care if they were laid off.)

Originally, the play only had three immigrant characters. The U.S. version keeps Iranian immigrant Mahtab (Nicole Ansari) and Turkish immigrant Leyla (Layla Khoshnoudi), but replaces a Polish immigrant character with Inés (Carmen Zilles), a Mexican immigrant, to better reflect how immigrants of color are central to the labor movement in America.

The other characters had no identities attached to them, so the play’s director, Mei Ann Teo, cast a wide net during auditions. This resulted in a deeply inclusive cast that reflects how people of color, immigrants and trans people have long been at the forefront of the labor movement, but are often not depicted in narratives about it. In a play about the exploitation of labor and what workers are forced to give up, Teo (who uses they/them pronouns) said it was an obvious choice to make.

“We are on the land with a history of enslaved labor and stolen land. What does it mean to have a Black woman saying, ‘Always the same, always the same, always the same’?” they said, referring to one character’s lines from the play. “What does it mean to make sure that the actual history of who was behind collective action is resonating in the production, so that it doesn’t do the same fucking perpetual erasure that constantly happens?”

Sushma Saha, Mahira Kakkar, Layla Khoshnoudi, Jojo Brown, Simone Immanuel, and Danielle Davenport in "7 Minutes."

The inclusive casting also gives the play added dimensions, making its ideas and dilemmas feel “much more alive,” Teo said. By delving deep into colorism, anti-Blackness and divides among different immigrant generations, for example, an authentic and complex range of conflicts unfold.

“Having a group of people with a lot of inclusive experiences that represent the working class, that represent folks who are marginalized and have the most pressure upon them and the most stakes in terms of what they have to lose — that’s where I started from,” they said. “Once those actors started to come through, it was like, ’Oh, wow. That just rings so much more differently when it’s this person.’”

Throughout the production process, Waterwell and Working Theater reached out to union organizers and labor experts to partner with them and invite them to the play. Several of them said they saw many real-life themes in the play, such as the way our work and the relationships we build with our colleagues are central to many of our lives, and all the things we sacrifice for our jobs.

The debate among the play’s workers reflectsthe internal dynamics of how you have to balance your own life and your own needs and what you are managing in your life, and sometimes put that aside for the bigger question about what does this mean for the group, for my union?” said Dr. Patricia Campos-Medina, a longtime labor organizer and the executive director of The Worker Institute at Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations.

Campos-Medina said while watching the play, she thought about “all of the choices that we make, the things that we give up in our work because what they’re offering seems appealing.” For example, “it made me think about, in my current life, what we have given up by working on Zoom. Like, I used to have an hour to commute, which was my time. I could read a book. I could stroll and take a cup of coffee. That was my time to separate myself from my family and go to the office.”

“Now, I am taking a call, a Zoom call, and drinking my coffee, and I have two more hours that I have given up to my employer because of convenience, right? So I was thinking, ‘Oh my God, this is so relevant!’” she continued. “‘I’ve just given it up to my employer.’”

Sarah Hughes, a labor journalist and organizer at Labor Notes, advised Evans and the play’s cast on some of the labor-related details of the production. She said the play accurately portrays the powerlessness that many workers face when “our bosses continue to extract more and more from us” — as well as how the tide may be turning.

“When a boss comes and says, ‘Oh, things are tight this year. We need to cut overtime, or we have to change your pension, or we have to cut the pension,’” Hughes said. “We’re in this labor movement now where we’ve been giving concessions now for decades. And people don’t have the power to fight back. But this last year was one of these big moments of people being like, ‘Fuck that.’”

As Campos-Medina pointed out, “right now, the trend in society is a reshifting of the relationship between workers and management. That reshifting is being seen in the Starbucks campaign, in the Amazon organizing campaign, in the organizing that is going on at Google. Everywhere, we’re reshifting that relationship,” she said. “Right now, workers feel that we have a little bit of the upper hand. But will that lead to more power on our side? I think it’s yet to be determined.”

Starbucks employees and their supporters react to the votes from their union election on Dec. 9, 2021, in Buffalo, New York. The workers voted to unionize over the company’s objections, pointing the way to a new labor model for the 50-year old coffee giant.
Starbucks employees and their supporters react to the votes from their union election on Dec. 9, 2021, in Buffalo, New York. The workers voted to unionize over the company’s objections, pointing the way to a new labor model for the 50-year old coffee giant.

The March 18 performance of “7 Minutes” featured a discussion with members of Starbucks Workers United. They talked about some of the reasons for the groundswell in union organizing, such as “getting more control over just the basics of how the stores are run,” said Revna Charasz, a Starbucks barista in New York who has been active in union organizing efforts. “It feels like there’s so many decisions that are made by upper management that we just have no control over, which is obviously the same in any modern workplace, basically.”

Charasz, who uses they/them pronouns, said they saw many of their own experiences reflected in the play, such as “the whole divide of these people in this other room, the people in suits who have all this power over us on the other side of the door, and that it’s kind of daunting to try to take some power from them.” Seeing the play and feeling the energy of the post-show discussion “was pretty inspiring and validating in the sense of, like, being around all these people who’ve been doing this for such a long time.”

Evans said Waterwell is exploring ways to bring “7 Minutes” to other venues and reach more audiences. For example, she and Hughes hope to feature a reading of the play at Labor Notes’ national conference in Chicago this June. One of Waterwell’s last in-person productions before the pandemic was “The Courtroom,” which Moayed developed from verbatim transcripts of an immigrant woman’s deportation hearings. Directed by Evans, it was performed at venues such as the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in Lower Manhattan and at the New York City Bar Association — all part of the company’s mission to make theater more accessible and bring it to more people who might see their lived experiences reflected in it.

“A thing that really is profound to me is the responses of, ‘I’m going through this right now,’ that we get from the audience,” Teo said. “‘I just quit that job.’ ‘I just went through this.’ ‘Oh, I needed to hear this.’ There are messages and technologies in the play that are incredibly alive right now. They were for me.”

Teo explained that when Evans first sent them the play, they were thinking about leaving a toxic job.

“Do I leave, or do I stay for the people? Do I stay for the BIPOC actors who are like, ‘Oh, thank God you’re here.’ Or do I leave and show them that they can leave too?” they said. “I was like, ‘Oh my God, this is the most traumatic thing I’ve ever had to do, is step away from a job that I love and step away from people that I care for.’ But that, actually, sometimes can be the best thing we can do, and I remember the play helped me make that decision. And I remember thinking, ‘If the play can help me make that decision, what can the play do in the world?’”



[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

Good Times and Bum Times Made These Theater Veterans Even Stronger

[ad_1]

It’s challenging enough for an actor to portray someone who is alive and well. But can you imagine the extra scrutiny that comes when your model is sitting in the director’s chair?

In the new musical “The Gardens of Anuncia,” Priscilla Lopez plays the title role, which is largely based on the childhood of the show’s director and co-choreographer, Graciela Daniele. Or at least, Daniele pointed out in a recent conversation, it’s “a version of me. A better version.”

When the two stage veterans sat together last week, a day after performances began at Lincoln Center Theater, they laughed continuously, and threw themselves into the conversation with the full-bodied gusto of born performers. They mimed pranks they once pulled on castmates, hummed tunes from long-forgotten shows, and punctuated their stories with enough sound effects to make a Foley artist jealous.

There might also have been a little bit of tearing up as they reminisced about their decades in the Broadway trenches — Lopez is 75, Daniele is almost a decade older — and reflected on the new project, a memory musical based on Daniele’s childhood in post-World War II Buenos Aires.

She and the show’s lyricist, composer and book writer, Michael John LaChiusa, have worked together several times, first when she directed his 1994 Off Broadway musical “Hello Again” and later on the Tony-nominated “Marie Christine” (1999), and their conversations spurred him. “I remember all the stories she was telling me about growing up in Argentina,” LaChiusa said. “A lot them had to do with how a woman became a ballerina, and then a dancer, a choreographer and a director. And that was all on her own terms and on her own talent.”

LaChiusa thought this journey would make for a good musical, but his friend was resistant. Daniele finally gave in, under one condition. “One day, I said, ‘If you want to write something about my life, write about the three women who created me,’” she said. “And it’s not only me: Always somebody has somebody. I think that’s the reason why it’s so emotional. You connect not to my story, but to what you have inside, your experience.”

Lopez chimed in: “We are all Anuncia in one way or another. When my husband saw the show last night, he said ‘It’s your story, too, Priscilla.’” Daniele’s formidable support group consisted of her mother (played in the show by Eden Espinosa), her aunt (Andréa Burns) and her grandmother (the LaChiusa regular Mary Testa). Kalyn West plays the young Anuncia, while Enrique Acevedo and Tally Sessions handle the various male roles. All of them were in the world premiere of the show at the Old Globe in San Diego two years ago; Lopez joined the cast in New York, replacing Carmen Roman.

For LaChiusa, Lopez was an obvious choice. “For one thing, she has pedigree and I wanted to have a 70-year-old play this, or even older,” he said. “And she’s a star, and Graciela is a star — she shines when she walks in a room. When Priscilla’s on the stage, you can’t keep your eyes off her.”

The two women did not talk much about the project itself in an early meeting. “We spent an afternoon trading family stories,” Lopez said. “We talked about our lives, which are —”

“Very, very similar,” Daniele picked up. “Starting as dancers and then going into shows, and then she becoming a star and me becoming a choreographer-director.”

Daniele’s early years were spent in Perón’s Argentina, where she studied ballet as a young girl. Her career as a dancer eventually took her to Paris, then New York, where she made her Broadway debut in “What Makes Sammy Run?” in 1964. Two years later, Lopez, who grew up in a Puerto Rican family in New York City, landed her first Broadway show — the musical adaptation of “Breakfast at Tiffany’s.”

That production’s claim to infamy is that it closed after four previews. A dejected Lopez took the first job that turned up — at a club in Miami Beach. Used to saucy showgirls, the locals did not take well to what Lopez described as “an All-American revue, very wholesome,” and started shouting for more skin. “I was mortified,” she said.

When the songwriter Bob Merrill told her about his new musical, “Henry, Sweet Henry,” she flew back to New York to audition. That 1967 production’s choreographer asked if she would like to be a swing. “I had no idea what a swing was,” Lopez said. “I thought a swing was, like, you sit on a swing.” (She and Daniele hooted in unison.)

“Henry, Sweet Henry” turned out to be another flop, but that choreographer was none other than Michael Bennett. A few years later, Lopez would be one of the dancers whose stories formed the backbone of his classic show “A Chorus Line.” She originated the role of Diana, who sings “What I Did for Love” and “Nothing” — the latter drawing from Lopez’s time at the High School of Performing Arts in Manhattan.

It’s to those formative years that, once again, Lopez reaches back when asked who her boosters were. First was her mother, who said that young Priscilla had worked too hard to get into the elite school and should not quit. Another early supporter was her acting teacher Vinnette Carroll. “As horrible as Mister Karp was, that’s how wonderful she was,” Lopez said, referring to the teacher who makes memorable running appearances in “Nothing.”

Bennett played a key role in Daniele’s life as well. He spotted her dancing in “Promises, Promises” in 1968, and took her under his wing. He incorporated some of her suggestions in “Coco” the following year, and made her one of his assistants in “Follies” (1971). She also played the young Vanessa in that production, but her increased responsibilities did not interfere with her impish humor. One of her dance partners, Steven Boockvor, was driving her up the wall with his jokes, so she decided to strike back in the “Loveland” number. “We were looking at each other closely for a long time,” Daniele said, “and one day I went …” She lets a string of spittle dangle from her lips. “Michael said, ‘What are you doing?’ I said, ‘I’m sorry, I had a problem in my mouth and I was drooling.’”

In the 1970s, Lopez and Daniele participated in “The Milliken Breakfast Show,” a series of industrial musicals bolstered by the likes of Ann Miller, Robert Morse, Gwen Verdon and … Michael Bennett. One year, Lopez was Chita Rivera’s understudy. “It was a run-through and she had some appointment or something,” Lopez said. “Michael said, ‘Priscilla, get up here. Do it!’ I went [to a jaunty tune] bump-bump-bump-bump.”

As for Daniele, Bennett encouraged her to choreograph one of the Millikens, and she never looked back. She would go on to earn a total of 10 Tony nominations for choreography and directing, including for her work on “Once on This Island” and “Ragtime,” and in 2021 she received a special Tony Award for lifetime achievement.

Anuncia does mention such an award, but for the most part the new show is about the women who surrounded her, and about looking back in the twilight of your life. Living memories are an essential component of the story, along with the acknowledgment that there are some that we may want to tweak.

When asked if she had any memories she would like to change, Lopez could not think of anything on the spot. Daniele, however, brought up her father, who deserted the family when she was 6.

“I wish I could forgive him,” she said. “I’m 84 years old, and I can’t. There’s nothing I can do about it. That was too huge a pain to my mother, to my family, to everything. So it’s still there.”

In the show, the elder Anuncia intervenes when That Man is hitting her mother, admonishing him: “No forgiveness for you. Never.” For Daniele, it’s a cathartic moment. “I love when Anuncia says ‘Neveeeeeer!’” she said. “I live it in you. Thank you, Priscilla.”

“So I finally got it right?” Lopez asked. They cackled with delight.

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

Sarah Jessica Parker Tests Positive For COVID-19, Sidelining Broadway Play

[ad_1]

NEW YORK (AP) — The second shoe has dropped at “Plaza Suite” on Broadway.

First Matthew Broderick tested positive for COVID-19 and a few days later his wife and co-star, Sarah Jessica Parker, has done so herself.

Parker tested positive Thursday and the show has been canceled. What happens with future performances “will be announced as soon as possible,” according to producers.

The show had kept going despite Broderick’s absence on Tuesday with an understudy, but with neither star — who play three couples over three acts in a hotel suite — available, producers had little options.

The twin cases at “Plaza Suite” comes at a time when coronavirus cases are rising in the city and on Broadway again.

The musical “A Strange Loop” canceled its first preview performance after COVID-19 cases were discovered within the company and the off-Broadway musical “Suffs” has been derailed. Daniel Craig has also been sidelined from his revival of “Macbeth.”



[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

Royal Exchange scraps artistic director model after 47 years

[ad_1]

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More

Théâtre de la Ville Reopens After 7 Years of Renovations

[ad_1]

A lot can happen in seven years. When the Théâtre de la Ville — a flagship venue for Paris’s contemporary dance and theater scene — last welcomed audiences, in late 2016, TikTok had just launched. A pandemic seemed like a far-fetched idea. La(Horde), the influential dance collective featured prominently during the theater’s reopening festivities this month, was still wholly unknown.

Roughly half of the Théâtre de la Ville’s current employees joined during the closure and didn’t set foot in the building during renovations, its director Emmanuel Demarcy-Mota said during a tour of the playhouse last month. (While it was closed, shows continued at a temporary location, the Espace Cardin, at partner venues and on the Théâtre de la Ville’s second stage, Les Abbesses.)

Anticipation for the reopening was high, and the Théâtre de la Ville does look — and feel — different. First, it boasts a new, slightly unwieldy name: the Théâtre de la Ville-Sarah Bernhardt, a nod to its most famous owner, the French actress who ran the space between 1899 and 1923. (The venue’s website has yet to reflect the rebrand.)

The biggest change, however, hits when you walk through the doors. The heavy-looking concrete staircase that led from the entrance into the auditorium has been eliminated. Discrete stairs are now hidden in the back of the hall, and two curved mezzanines in warm wood tones hug the facade — with panoramic views of the neighborhood, including the Théâtre du Châtelet, the rival playhouse that stands across the street.

The closure was never intended to last this long. The initial plan was a partial renovation to bring the Théâtre de la Ville, which hadn’t had a significant upgrade since 1967, up to current security and technical standards. Difficulties quickly piled up, initially because of extensive lead and asbestos, then owing to the Covid pandemic. The total cost, first estimated at 26 million euros, or $27.5 million, ultimately rose to €40 million ($42 million).

The result is a distinctly 21st-century update, which adds yet another layer to what was already an architectural mille-feuille. Inaugurated in 1862, the building was destroyed during the Paris Commune of 1871 and rebuilt a few years later. It was then rebranded several times before the city of Paris chose to reimagine it in 1966. While the facade and roof remained, the Italian-style interior was gutted in favor of a more egalitarian, Brutalist-style auditorium, designed by Jean Perrottet and Valentin Fabre.

The auditorium still feels familiar. While the seats are now a muted shade of sand instead of gray, its concrete underpinnings — dotted here and there with gold leaf — still hang over visitors in the hall. Behind the scenes, however, the stage machinery has been entirely updated. Even the mezzanines are now equipped with curtains and professional lighting, for smaller in situ performances.

And Demarcy-Mota, Théâtre de la Ville’s director since 2008, is attempting to make up for lost time. In early October, the reopening was marked with a free 26-hour performance marathon, “The Great Vigil,” starring around 300 artists from the fields of dance, theater and music.

Some, like the choreographers Angelin Preljocaj and Lucinda Childs, were regulars long before the Théâtre de la Ville closed. Another frequent visitor, the flamenco star Israel Galvan, made a surprise appearance for a brilliant duet with the French harpsichordist Benjamin Alard.

Others were making their Théâtre de la Ville debut, like the pianist Yi-Lin Wu, who set a meditative tone around 1 a.m. with a performance of Ravel’s shimmering “Gaspard de la Nuit.” There was something eerie about wandering the halls late into the night, encountering a highly theatrical statue of Bernhardt playing Phaedra, by a staircase, and climbing up to a newly opened studio, La Coupole, to watch “Ionesco Suite,” a five-play mash-up of the French dramatist’s works, directed by Demarcy-Mota — until well past 3 a.m.

For many visitors at the opening, it was a joyful reunion with a playhouse that shaped much of the French dance scene in the last decades of the 20th century. At that time, the Théâtre de la Ville fiercely promoted avant-garde contemporary dance, and became known as the Parisian home of the Tanztheater luminary Pina Bausch, who visited each year.

This identity had begun to shift in the years before the Théâtre de la Ville closed, with a greater diversity of choreographic trends represented on its stage. Still, during its seven-year absence, other Parisian venues like the Grande Halle of La Villette have stepped up their dance offerings or reoriented their focus to favor more diverse voices and collectives, many of them steeped in street dance styles.

So as the Théâtre de la Ville-Sarah Bernhardt kicked its first season into gear this month, it was sometimes hard to discern what sets it apart from other theaters. High-profile choreographers are no longer identified with individual venues, the way Théâtre de la Ville once was with Bausch: Every programmer in town seems to want the same names.

The collective La(Horde), which took over the stage after “The Great Vigil,” is one example. Less than a week before its run of “Marry Me In Bassiani,” a production the group created for a Georgian company, Iveroni Ensemble, La(Horde) was across the street at the Théâtre du Châtelet with its newest creation, “Age of Content.”

There will be plenty more opportunities to see what Théâtre de la Ville-Sarah Bernhardt does with its revitalized venue as its season progresses. Demarcy-Mota, a theater director who splits his programming between dance, theater and a smattering of music events, said in his inauguration speech last month that he sees the stage as “a space for contradiction.”

And the thrill of discovering new work in a theater known for groundbreaking performances could already be felt last week when La Coupole, the upstairs studio, hosted “En Addicto,” a one-man show inspired by a monthslong residency in a hospital wing devoted to addicts.

Its director and performer, Thomas Quillardet, let the voices of staff and patients alike flow through him with just the right mix of empathy and levity. It brought to mind Demarcy-Mota’s commitment to sending Théâtre de la Ville artists to local hospitals during the pandemic, to share poems or mini-performances. It’s been a long wait, but these artists can finally come home.

[ad_2]

Source link

Read More
TOP